How evolution shapes our negotiations (2/2): Males compete amongst themselves

The previous article described how men tend to be more prone to using unethical negotiating tactics partly because of the heritage of the early ages of humankind. However, that is not the only reason.

Illustration

The INSEAD business school also conducted tests in behavioural laboratories, during which participants were negotiating the purchase of property for a hotel group. The hypothetical owner very strongly rejected the idea of the property being used for commercial purposes. The instincts of participants were strengthened by showing them attractive or unattractive images of men and women.

Evolutionary contest in a modern setting

Participants had to write an initial statement describing their intent. That created an ethical dilemma: to lie or risk losing the deal? It turned out that men lied more, especially when they had seen attractive faces beforehand and were competing with a handsome male. On the other hand, when their counterpart was a woman, this tendency to lie was not present.

The same competitive dynamic also exists amongst women but unethical behaviour is not as strong as in the case of men. Women also preferred more subtle forms of deception.

How companies can protect themselves

Having a woman negotiating may be advantageous especially if the counterpart is a male. Generally speaking, women should be a part of negotiating teams and anything that is likely to exacerbate competitiveness (e.g. a macho corporate culture) should be reconsidered. It might also help if negotiations are scheduled for later in the day when testosterone levels are usually lower.

-jk-

Article source INSEAD Knowledge - INSEAD Business School knowledge portal
Read more articles from INSEAD Knowledge

Články v sérii

Aktuální

How evolution shapes our negotiations (1/2): Origins of male competitiveness

Aktuální

How evolution shapes our negotiations (2/2): Males compete amongst themselves